![]() It seems like this option isn't activated for the FP East lane and hence no error there. Kindly remove this traffic lane optimization and the analysis should be performed without issue. When the traffic lane optimization is activated for any lane, the software analyses with 3 vehicle positions transversely in the same lane (Sub_Left, center and Sub_Right). 2) Moving Load Analysis error - The error message indicates that traffic lane optimization must be activated for the FP West. However, this can simply be done by assigning a static load case for the footpath area and this static load case could be combined with the moving load cases in the Load Combinations. Answer:Hello, Following are the response: 1) Remaining area with variable width - It isn't possible to do this by means of a moving load lane definition. The error message for ‘FP West’ is as shown below. As you know, all the loads that are activated in construction stage are clubbed into Dead Load (CS) case. ![]() The lane width of ‘FP East’ is 2.25m, and the offset from the outside beam is only 0.1m, therefore the lane overhangs the edge beam. The static load cases of types which are not to be activated in construction stages (like temperature) would be automatically considered even with CS only option. However, this does not appear to be the case for the other footpath (called ‘FP East’). I have noticed that the analysis will not run when part of the footpath lane (called ‘FP West’) lies outside of the bridge deck. Is it possible to create a remaining area with a variable width? 2. Question: I have two queries relating to moving load analysis in Midas Civil.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |